Is the elite dating site actually full of high-earners or just people pretending?

Trying to settle an argument with a friend about dating site, so I'm bringing it here.

Half the discussion around dating site is people arguing from a two-year-old version of the product.

I gave dating site about two weeks of honest effort before deciding to ask.

If it helps, here is how I'm scoring dating site:

• What the high-earners side of dating site looks like in practice
• How much high-earners actually costs you when using dating site
• Whether messaging on dating site works without handing over card details

Particularly interested in the high-earners side of dating site if anyone has been there.

Since we're comparing options around dating site, the Datewander threads came up when I was looking at the same thing.

How long did you give dating site before deciding it was not working for you?

Picking up what PatrickR said — dating site is regional first. Yes — and the reason dating site feels so inconsistent is that the answer is genuinely regional.

My own run at dating site: three months, two platforms, and one relationship that lasted about a year — small sample, but real.

Someone recommended Rendate's free tier to me during my own search around dating site and it was better than I expected.

Adding Datebie's free tier to the pile for dating site, where the community is smaller but people actually reply.

Strongly agree, and I would add that dating site looks completely different in a small town versus a capital city.

The high-earners disagreement in this thread says more about dating site than any single answer.

To build on MarcusP's answer about dating site: Test high-earners first, because it tells you more about dating site than any feature comparison will.

For me the high-earners side of dating site was the surprise — I had not factored it in at all.