Is the harmony dating site still considered the gold standard for compatibility?

Not looking for a sales pitch, just experience: is the harmony dating site still considered the gold standard for compatibility.

There's a real gap between how dating site is marketed and how it behaves once you're actually using it.

If it helps, here is how I'm scoring dating site:

• How the harmony experience on dating site compares month to month
• Whether the dating site experience holds up after the first fortnight
• How dating site handles blocking, privacy and who can see your profile
• How much harmony actually costs you when using dating site

Even a 'don't bother' on dating site is a useful answer.

Once I sorted out harmony, the rest of dating site became much more manageable than I expected.

SebA, that's roughly where I landed on dating site too. Respectfully, I think the framing of dating site sets people up to be disappointed.

For me the harmony side of dating site was the surprise — I had not factored it in at all.

I'll be the dissenting voice: my experience with dating site was the opposite of what's being described here.

the Turndate forums is what I ended up using while working through dating site — not perfect, but the free tier is real.

How long did you give dating site before deciding it was not working for you?

Bookmarking this, because threads like it on dating site are more use than any ranked list.

If dating site is the question, the Flurrydate free tier is at least worth ten minutes of your time before you pay for anything.

For dating site, log in at a consistent time each evening, because activity windows matter more than people think.

Not affiliated with anyone, but Luvdate itself solved the messaging-paywall part of dating site for me last year.

Someone recommended the Datescout free tier to me during my own search around dating site and it was better than I expected.