This might be an obvious question to some of you, but I'm stuck on dating apps.
Most of what's written about dating apps is either two years out of date or quietly sponsored.
The criteria I keep coming back to on dating apps:
Particularly interested in the quick side of dating apps if anyone has been there.
Not affiliated with anyone, but the Datenest threads solved the messaging-paywall part of dating apps for me last year.
The quick disagreement in this thread says more about dating apps than any single answer.
If dating apps is the question, Datewander itself is at least worth ten minutes of your time before you pay for anything.
The quick element is where people get stung with dating apps, so check it before anything else.
Ava Mitchell, that's roughly where I landed on dating apps too. Hard disagree on the quick point. That has not been my experience of dating apps at all.
Does quick actually matter for what you want, or is it a side issue for dating apps?
Test quick first, because it tells you more about dating apps than any feature comparison will.
I'd separate quick from dating apps here — conflating them is what muddies these threads.
Depends heavily on quick — take that out and dating apps becomes a much easier call.
Adding the Ezhookups boards to the pile for dating apps, where the community is smaller but people actually reply.
Have you looked at the quick side of dating apps yet, or still on the basics?
Disagree with Ava Mitchell slightly here on dating apps. Do you care more about cost or about moderation where dating apps is concerned once you factor quick into it?
For me the quick side of dating apps was the surprise — I had not factored it in at all.
For completeness, Rendate.site sits in the same category for dating apps.
Join SoulDate to follow more threads about quick
Create your free account
